Actions By "T"

ACTIONS BY T - VIDEOS

JANET JACOBSON
http://my.tupperware.com/JanetJacobson

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Here is an example of our Newly designed DVD Series. Ordering information below!
Teddy Jacobson will sign any "DVD" that is purchased by request at no charge.

ACTIONS BY "T" VIDEO DVD LIST
Contact Charles Jacobson via email = actionsbytvideos@yahoo.com

1. THE TRUTH ABOUT BUYING A HANDGUN

2. HOW TO BUY USED HANDGUNS

3. HOW TO CLEAN YOUR HANDGUNS

4. DISASSEMBLY AND REASSEMBLY OF COLT 45 SERIES 80 – 1911

5. DISASSEMBLY AND REASSEMBLY OF S&W REVOLVERS

6. DISASSEMBLY AND REASSEMBLY OF SIG SAUER FOR CLEANING

7. DISASSEMBLY AND REASSEMBLY OF COLT 45 SERIES 70 – 1911

8. PREPARING A HANDGUN FOR STREET CARRY

9. HOW TO IMPROVE YOUR PISTOL AND REVOLVER

10. DISASSEMBLY AND REASSEMBLY OF GLOCK PISTOLS/CLEANING

11. HANDGUNS FOR WOMEN

12. TRUTH ABOUT STAINLESS STEEL, TITANIUM & PORTED GUNS

13. HANDGUN SIGHTS – EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW

14. THE TRUTH ABOUT AFTER MARKET PARTS AND ACCESSORIES

15. HANDGUNS AND ACCESSORIES THAT I WOULD NOT BUY

16. HOW TO SELECT A GUNSMITH AND PLATTER

17. HANDGUN SPRINGS – EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW

18. CARRYING A CONCEALED HANDGUN – TRUTH AND REALITY

19. SMALL HANDGUNS, HOLSTERS & AMMO FOR STREET CARRY

20. HANDGUN AMMUNITION – WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

21. SELECTING RELOADING EQUIPMENT

22. SELECTING RELOADING COMPONENTS

23. SELECTING THE BEST HAND TOOLS FOR THE GUNSMITH

SURVIVAL from Steve Quayle

Survivalism Grows Popular in Phoenix-area

residents are growing food, obtaining guns, sharing ideas

June 23, 2009
by Ryan Randazzo
The Arizona Republic

As the recession lingers, some Phoenix-area residents are shifting attention from their financial troubles, including falling home values and shrinking retirement savings, to stockpiling food and ammo.

Photo: Jeff Rodriguez, 26, a software engineer from Glendale, has stockpiled bags of grain in his garage. Rodriguez belongs to a local network of like-minded people who are studying survival tactics in the face of the economic downturn. (Tom Tingle / The Arizona Republic)

HOLLY NOTE: While Jeff's intentions are good, storing food in the garage isn't. Too high temperature is the #1 enemy of food storage. Temperatures easily top 100ºF for most of summer in this area and food stored under these conditions will deteriorate rapidly. Stored food needs constant temperatures not above 70ºF.

The second mistake is leaving food unprotected. This grain needs to be put in proper food-grade storage containers to seal out light and pests, and treated to remove oxygen and moisture. At this rate, unless Jeff plans to eat this food immediately, it's money wasted and a lot will be going in the trash bucket.

They worry the economic turmoil could lead to skyrocketing inflation, food scarcity, even violence. To prepare, they are forming social-networking groups to discuss how to store grains, purify water, plant gardens and, if needed, shoot guns.

"Most of us feel that if things do get better, it will be a long way out," said Jeff Rodriguez, a 26-year-old software engineer from Glendale. "I want to have some preparations in place."

The economy has him thinking a lot more about things like where his food comes from, how much cheap oil is left in the world and how people in the blazing-hot Valley would survive a major economic failure.

He has carefully prepared a 12-row, 384-square-foot garden, stores a ton and a half of grain in his home, and is considering buying pygmy goats or chickens.

He also has researched solar electricity and a rainwater-collection system.

He is far from alone. Rodriguez belongs to a local network of like-minded people who include retirees, young mothers and successful professionals.

These people are joining thousands nationwide who are studying survival tactics far from the backwoods bunkers associated with "survivalists."

At least two survival-related groups have formed in Phoenix since December, and groups with varying outlooks and politics have sprouted nationally from Kentucky to New York.

Of course, it's not unheard of for mainstream groups to prepare for emergencies. The Mormon Church, which reports 13.5 million members worldwide, has long counseled self-sufficiency and encourages families to keep a prudent supply of food on hand.

Disasters such as hurricanes and 9/11, and even perceived troubles like the Y2K bug, always increase interest in survivalism. The men behind the counters at U.S. Surplus Corp. in Phoenix see a crush of new customers every time tragedy strikes.

The newbies stand out from the military personnel and outdoor enthusiasts who stop in for rugged clothing, rations or canteens.

"They are the ones trying to fix up a cave to live in," store manager Gary Pickering said. "They are asking a lot of questions and buying things they normally wouldn't, like water-purification tablets."

Sales at the store haven't slid with the rest of the economy, officials said. Preparing for a disaster makes sense only if people actually know how to use the equipment they are buying, said Cody Lundin, who runs a survival-skills school in Prescott and authored two books on the subject.

He says people should learn to care for themselves in case of emergency whether a disaster is pending or the economy is tanking.

Last year was among the best ever for his school, although it's not always clear what motivates people to sign up.

"I'm seeing an influx of people simply calling to inquire what I think about stuff," Lundin said. "They are probing the waters because they are getting freaked out."

Professional counselor Rita Archambault said her East Valley clinic is treating more people with anxiety over the economy.

"I have not seen so much concern about the economy in my entire life," she said.

If planting a garden, raising poultry or stockpiling ammunition makes people feel better about their situation, good for them, she said.

"If you are not hurting anybody and you are reducing your anxiety, what harm is there?" Archambault said.

The only danger is if people get so obsessed that they neglect their job or family, she said.

It's not surprising that many of the people preparing for tough times are educated professionals, said Heidi Wayment, a social-psychology professor at Northern Arizona University who has researched disasters and anxiety.

"To understand the huge potential crisis that could come from economic collapse, you have to be educated," Wayment said. "I wouldn't say these people are crazy - far from it."

The people who are newly interested in survival skills recognize their eccentricity.

"I'm cognizant that what I'm doing is not normal," said Rodriguez, adding that his roommate thinks the food stockpile and garden are cool.

On a recent Friday evening, he and a few of the nearly 100 survivalism group members gathered at a Scottsdale bar. Amid the pumping dance music, they discussed the jobless rate, harvesting rainwater and protecting their property from looters.

"It would be fair to say most have at least some interest in firearms," Rodriguez said.

That's not to say the members glorify violence.

"I wouldn't even know what to do with a gun!" exclaimed MaryLou Benigno, 68.

Benigno, a retired teacher, has been gardening for years, but the economy has brought more urgency to her hobby.

She lectures the group on how to keep a worm-bed of compost under the kitchen sink from stinking up the house and the best places to buy seeds.

Benigno has been shopping for a cheap foreclosure home with land for a garden, which she hopes to share with friends.

"I don't want to be corny and say something like, 'Getting back to nature,' but if you develop a site properly, you could grow on every inch of the place," she said.

Lynn Smith, a Scottsdale commodities trader, spoke of his plans to head to Iowa for the summer, where his family owns a sprawling piece of land.

"It would be kind of hard to get by in the desert," he said.

Smith, 53, sold his home shortly after the real-estate peak in 2006 when he feared a market collapse and, despite a substantial income, now lives in an RV.

He can work remotely, so he'll spend the summer in the Midwest exploring how to grow food and may come back to Scottsdale next year, "depending what happens."

Smith pulled out aerial photographs of the Iowa property. "It's all flat, and I could see someone coming from any direction except this one patch of trees," he said.

The group nodded in agreement.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/06/23/20090623biz-survivalists0623.html

2 nd AMENDMENT - PUBLIC VIDEO

BIRTH CERTIFICATE WILL NOT GO AWAY

---

Why Obama wants to hide birth certificate

---

Posted: June 16, 2009    BY JOSEPH FARAH OF "WND"
1:00 am Eastern

© 2009 

Since I began my quixotic campaign to uncover Barack Obama's birth certificate, many have asked me about the president's possible motives for hiding it with such tenacity and diligence.

I think there are many plausible motives:

• Perhaps something in that birth certificate, if it indeed exists, would contradict assertions Obama has made about his life's story. These might even involve his true parental heritage. Without a real birth certificate, no one really knows who his parents were. So it is ridiculous even to speculate about whether citizenship could be conferred upon him by his mother, when we don't know for sure who his mother is.
• Perhaps it reveals a foreign birth, as Hawaii allowed for in 1961 while still issuing the "certification of live birth" we have seen posted on his website.
• Or perhaps it will show just what Obama has claimed all along – a birth in Hawaii to two officially non-citizen parents, for the purpose of establishing "natural born citizenship" under the Constitution.

What do I mean by that last possibility?

Well, as you know, in 2008, the Senate of the United States held hearings to determine if one of the presidential candidates fulfilled the requirement of being a "natural born citizen." It wasn't Barack Obama. It was John McCain, who was born on a U.S. military base overseas to two U.S. citizens.

Start your own elibibility billboard campaign in your neighborhood with WND's new yard signs, asking: "Where's the Birth Certificate?"

On April 10 of last year, two senators, both Democrats, Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Claire McCaskill of Missouri, introduced a resolution into upper house expressing a sense of the Senate that McCain was indeed a "natural born citizen."

It's interesting what Leahy had to say on the subject: "Because he was born to American citizens (emphasis added), there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen. I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the U.S. Senate."

And, indeed it was. It was also, interestingly, the only such hearing held by the Congress on the subject of "natural born citizenship" and its application to the 2008 presidential race. Why was that interesting? Because everyone involved in this process knew – or should have known – that the life story told by Barack Obama would raise far more doubts about his eligibility than McCain's.

Notice Leahy did not say one parent citizen would qualify a child for "natural born citizenship." He indicted it would take two to tango.

He did so again at a Judiciary Committee hearing April 3, when he asked then-Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, a former federal judge, if he had any doubts about McCain's eligibility to serve as president.

"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen," Chertoff responded – again underlining the fact that both parents would need to be citizens.

And what did Leahy say to that? "That is mine, too."

By the way, Obama voted for this resolution, so he obviously agrees with the definition of what constitutes a "natural born citizen" – the offspring of two U.S. citizens.

Now, I don't know who Barack Obama's parents are, because I have never seen his birth certificate. All I've seen is a facsimile of a "certification of live birth" on the Internet. That document, even if genuine, proves nothing about Obama's birth in Hawaii or who his parents were. Hawaii had a very slipshod practice in 1961 of issuing these documents to babies born outside the country and listing parents who may not have been the parents at all.

But I do know who Barack Obama claims his parents were. According to him, neither one of them was an American citizen able to confer natural born citizenship on a child. One, Barack Obama Sr., was a foreign national from Kenya, and the other, Stanley Ann Dunham, was too young to have qualified under the law for bestowing that privilege on her son, even if the father had been a citizen and even in the unlikely event Obama was actually born in Hawaii!

So, if we are to take Obama at his word, he is not a natural born citizen and not eligible to serve as president.

YOUR RIGHT TO OWN A GUN

Loss Of Second Amendment
Closer Than You Think
6-7-9

 

 

You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun.. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows.   One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.   In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.         "What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.   "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."   The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.           Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.   A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.   The judge sentences you to life in prison.   This case really happened.   On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term.           How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once-great British Empire?   It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns. Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.   Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987... Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.   The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.) [MM: Problem-Reaction-Solution...played to perfection by MI-5!!!]   Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.   For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, Sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens.   During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to "armed self-defense" came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were criminally charged while the real criminals were released.   Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."   All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.   When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good [brainwashed, ignorant and dumbed-down] British subjects, most people obeyed the law [sic]. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.   How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars.   Sound familiar?   WAKE UP AMERICA ; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.         "...It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." --Samuel Adams   If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know. You better wake up cause your new president is going to do this very same thing over here if he can get it done. And there are stupid people in congress and on the street that will go right along with him.

IRAN IS OUT OF CONTROL

IAEA: Accelerated Iranian, Syrian enrichment out of control

DEBKAfile Special Analysis

June 5, 2009, 1:36 PM (GMT+02:00)

Iran's enrichment plant at Natanz

According to the calculations of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency in its new report, Iran will be able to produce one nuclear bomb by the end of this year, doubling that figure in 2010. DEBKAfile's military sources note that these estimates only apply to uranium enrichment at Natanz. They do not factor in the product of Iran's clandestine enrichment plants.

Friday night, June 5, officials in Vienna disclosed that Iran was found to have accumulated quantities of low-enriched uranium (1,339 kilos produced since November 2008 plus 839 kilos in stock) - enough to convert into the amount of high-enriched uranium needed for making a single nuclear bomb.

More than 7,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges were installed at Natanz, adding an extra 2,000 from February, the agency has found.

At this rate, 10,000 centrifuges will be spinning at Natanz with a capacity to enrich enough uranium for 2 bombs by the end of the year, double the IAEA's modest estimate by its own figures.

From January, when US president Barack Obama took office, Tehran has won a year's grace for developing its nuclear program. Direct dialogue on which he insists will not begin before July. Progress will be evaluated at year's end, a six-month deadline accepted by Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Iran has therefore been granted plenty of time to make hay i.e. make nukes - free of diplomatic or military constraints.

The IAEA admits its investigations are stalled both in Iran and Syria, where its inspectors also reported Friday the discovery of new traces of man-made uranium near Damascus.

Iranian officials insist their nuclear program is peaceful and refuse to answer questions or cooperate in any way with UN inspectors. At one point in its new report, the IAEA asked for cameras with different wide-range angles for Natanz, indicating that even there, the Iranians are playing cat and mouse to conceal the real scale of their activities from view.

Damascus is similarly stonewalling on the international inspectors' inquiries about the new traces of man-made uranium particles. DEBKAfile's military sources note that these particles could come from only two sources:

One is a new enrichment site. This site has reported repeatedly in the past year that Syria had secretly restarted its banned nuclear activities at three concealed locations which were constructed after Israel destroyed its unfinished plutonium reactor on Sept. 6, 2007.

Alternatively, Syria may be importing enriched uranium smuggled out of Iran, North Korea or Kazakhstan.

GERALD CELENTE - NO RECOVERY

DEATH OF AMERICA from Steve Quayle

Overthrown - Death of America - Index

BW

Kathy couldn't believe this was happening. After all, this was America, it couldn't happen here. But it was. Before the power had become so unreliable, and sporadic, she and her husband Tim, had seen the President come on the T.V. to talk to the American people. New York, L.A., and Washington D.C. had been hit with nuclear weapons. What hadn't been wiped out by the blasts, was so contaminated by radiation that rescue operations would be delayed until the radiation had died down. But until that happened, martial law was in effect.

With most of the military engaged in the middle east, the President had an idea. One that had been on his mind for a long time. N.A.T.O. troops were already in America. Some had been stationed on active military bases. Others were kept out of sight on bases that had been closed down for years. None of them cared a bit about the Constitution. They would do as they were told, without remorse or hesitation. After all, they weren't shooting their own people. This was America. These people needed to be brought down. They had been running things all over the world for far to long. The President knew that was what they were thinking. This was his chance to take full control over the nation. The members of Congress that hadn't been killed, didn't have a place to meet. He would make sure they never did. With numerous Presidential Orders, and Presidential Decision Directives already in place, in case of something like this, of course, he had the authority to rule by decree.

It wasn't long before the members of different gangs found out that these men weren't what they were expecting. Foolishly they had assumed they would be like the cops they were used to, and could deal with. They had expected these troops to follow the law, as did the American National Guardsmen. They didn't. It was as if they made up their own laws as they went. Soon the gang bangers were starting to drop like flies, as the foreign troops opened fire on them on sight. They didn't even try to capture them. They just shot them.

STEVE QUAYLE & ALEX JONES

www.worldnetdaily.com